The moderator frames AI risk as a consequence of choices about speed and security.
Framing references external events without independent verification.
Likely speaker
Responsible AI: Ethics, Governance and PracticeWatch passage →
DEFINITION USED IN THIS COLLECTION
Risk tradeoff.
Explicit balancing of risk, opportunity, speed, cost or uncertainty.
What it includes
Explicit balancing of risk, opportunity, speed, cost or uncertainty.
Where the boundary lies
A harm named without a choice or competing objective is unequal harms or reliability.
How speakers put it.
The definition above is used to organise this collection. The passages below show how the idea appears in discussion.
Evidence in practice.
All 30 coded passages →Analyst applies. The moderator frames AI risk as a consequence of choices about speed and security.
Qualifies the boundary. A harm named without a choice or competing objective is unequal harms or reliability.
AI can amplify exclusion, surveillance and discrimination while even nominally useful systems may fail under demand.
Examples are reported and not evaluated in detail.
Likely speaker
Becky FaithSenior Research Fellow; Development Lecturer · FCDO; Institute of Development StudiesSpeaking in a personal capacityLinkedIn ↗
Responsible AI: Ethics, Governance and PracticeWatch passage →
Differences and limits.
No event-wide agreement is inferred from coding. Compare the attributed examples and boundaries; co-occurrence is not evidence of agreement.
A harm named without a choice or competing objective is unequal harms or reliability.
Related concepts.
Explore the concepts used in related passages below.
Codes that occur in the same passages
Co-occurrence describes coding, not equivalence, causation or agreement.